Buzzillions Company Blog Logo

Zune vs. iPod: The Audiophile’s Suprising Choice

I like metaphors.  I use them too much, to the point I should probably go into some kind of program.  But since I’m still firmly in denial, there’s no sense in stopping now.  I’ll begin by saying I have several iPods, the iPhone and a MacBook.  To use the worst and most disturbing metaphor I’ve heard bantered around the corporate world these days…I’ve drunk the Kool-Aid.  And I’m not alone.  Apple iPods are nearly as pervasive as cell phones where I live.  When they came out in 2001, they changed portable music forever and became the best selling digital audio player in history.   My two year old can actually slot my iPod into the home stereo and, using the track wheel, find Lupe Fiasco (his current favorite) by the album cover art.  I’d say you can’t beat that for usability.  I knew there were similar players out there, but sort of assumed they would go the way of betamax tapes and HD DVD…sorry, you lose, thanks for playing.  There was no need for me to pay attention to the other guys because, well, I was already dating the rock star.  But the other day, someone called my attention to some data we’re seeing on Buzzillions right now with regards to the Zune and audiophiles opinions of them.  We know this because when someone writes a review we ask people how they describe themselves. In this case the choices are: “Casual Listener”, “Avid Listener” and “Audiophile”.  Turns out the Zune is not only liked by those who select “Audiophile”, but liked enough to be number one in this group of people.  Which means of course that the revered iPod is in second place.

Why is this?  Do these audiophiles know something I don’t, or is the New York Times onto something when they hypothesize that some people are simply buying the Zune because it is NOT the iPhone?  While there do seem to be anti-Apple zealots out there (though they hardly outweigh the rampant Microsoft-is-the-devil’s-spawn sentiment) surely there are people buying them for more than the satisfaction of knowing there’s one less iPod on the planet.  So I took a look at the reviews and specifically what the audiophiles liked about the Zune. Reviewers point to a few features as being stand outs.  Among these are the included headphones, which they say are higher quality than the standard issue iPod headphones.  In addition, users point to the integrated FM radio, the durability, the excellent sound quality, the large screen and larger font sizes making the display easier to read, especially when using in a car.  CNET’s Zune vs. iPod Prizefight gives the face off between the two a tie, which they themselves seem genuinely surprised by given iPod’s overwhelming popularity.  Most intriguing to me, it sounds from the reviews like my kids would find it equally as easy to use as the iPod. All this has me thinking (brace yourself for another metaphor) that the rock star I’m dating…maybe he’s not so great after all.  Maybe, like those tedious and formulaic teen movies, I should take a closer look at the less popular outcast - the one who could really win me over, if only I’d give him the chance.

4 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. Jack

    Wow, quite the eye opener. I, too, had always assumed that the hype around the iPod was justified by better all-around performance. It’s interesting to hear that an iPod killer may actually exist, if only in certain circles.

    I love the tie-ins to pop culture. Great way to keep the blog-reading masses thinking!

  2. Bridget

    I too drank the Kool-Aid (and have vowed never to use that metaphor again- thanks for the reminder). I am not an audiophile by any stretch of the imagination. I dated one once and it was not unpleasant. The hours spent in various high-end stereo shops listening to “Fool in the Rain” over and over again were actually kind of fun, but if there was any discernable difference between the various speakers that each cost more than my first car, I couldn’t see what all the fuss was about. At any rate, I have three iPods: a shuffle, a nano and an 80GB and they all sound fine to me. I bought the shuffle, the nano was a hand-me down and the 80GB was a gift. I use one of them almost every day.

    I checked out the cnet article you linked to and I have to say that even though the iPod walked way bloodied and bruised in the head-to-head contest, the areas where the Zune won (sexiness, sound and science) are less important to me than the one where it lost (compatibility). I’m not an audiophile and I’m also not a big techie… so the fact that the iPod is pretty much plug and play is very important. Plus, I really like having iTunes on my computer. I do hate the way Apple tries to restrict what you can do with your music, but since almost everyone has an iPod, there are plenty of people to help find ways around those restrictions. So I’ve got to say… I love my iPods. The 80GB is one of the best gifts I’ve ever received… almost as cool as the Capsela I got for Christmas when I was 8.

  3. Eddie

    Interesting post! It does beg the question why Microsoft would bring to market a substitute product when a clear market winner, the iPod, already exists?

    Did Microsoft metaphorically thumb its nose at Apple with a me-too device? Or did it have the user at heart - designing a superior, audiophile-focused machine to be proud of? Perhaps MS thumbed its nose and realised that coincidentally, it made a nice sound.

    In any case, you’ve excited our curiousity about the Zune. Will have to borrow one to find out more.

  4. I would not look at the iPod as a clear winner. I think what makes the iPod is iTunes. Flash based storage is better

Reply to “Zune vs. iPod: The Audiophile’s Suprising Choice”

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation